1. Part of the exam is assessing how appropriate the documents you chose to use are to your topic. be careful in your choices. 2.

1. Part of the exam is assessing how appropriate the documents you chose to use are to your topic. be careful in your choices. 2. Terms will not be considered correct unless you engage how Judt approaches them. This does not mean you simply need to cite from Judt once, but if you disagree with his approach you must take into consideration his argument. You are free to use additional sources (online, library, etc) but no term will count unless you also include Judt’s treatment of it. 3) Essays should keep track of temporal issues – you can make an argument about causes, but you should have a clear idea about timeline, and influence. You must write an essay of , based on a thesis. That thesis must construct that links no less than . The purpose is not simply to compare and contrast, but to make an argument about larger processes, trends or concepts that encompass those terms. • This isn’t the professor being capricious; online information may from the material we’re working with, because it’s outside of the context of the class. There are that you can make; there is no single “correct” answer. There are, however, many possible answers. See “tips” below. 1) Dubček’s Reforms (not who Dubček is). 2) Kádár’s Hungary (policies, not the individual). 3) Imre Nágy 4) Charter 77 5) Détente 6) Khrushchev’s Reforms (policies, not the individual). 7) “National Communism” in Romania 8) 1968 in Eastern Europe 9) Leonid Brezhnev’s foreign policy. • Look to make a relatively sophisticated argument. Don’t go for low-hanging fruit or facile comparisons. • You cite your evidence — variously from Judt, lecture or the texts. • The temptation will be to write an “8-paragraph” essay — an intro, a paragraph on each term, and a conclusion. Avoid this. Think about ; then think about how you could break that argument down into 3 or 4 major points; and think about how each term, text or source to those sub-points. • Be careful about broad assertions. You to make some, since you have relatively limited data — but that doesn’t mean you can make arguments about change over 4 decades without engaging differences in context. • Since this is a take-home, I won’t forbid you from using concepts from the three course texts, the assigned readings or other sources. However, isn’t what I’m looking for — be wary! And remember that the key thing is to use the to construct your argument; additional material can , but don’t let it overwhelm the assignment.

Need your ASSIGNMENT done? Use our paper writing service to score better and meet your deadline.

Click Here to Make an Order Click Here to Hire a Writer