1. Read about the case of Henry Molaison (HM) online. 2. Wh…

1. Read about the case of Henry Molaison (HM) online. 2. What does HM’s case of amnesia say about human memory? 3. How do cases like HM help researchers understand learning and cognitio?

The case of Henry Molaison, more commonly known as HM, provides invaluable insight into the intricacies and functions of human memory. HM was an individual who endured severe amnesia due to the surgical removal of portions of his medial temporal lobes, including the hippocampus, to alleviate his epileptic seizures. As a result, HM experienced profound anterograde amnesia, meaning he was unable to form new memories after the surgery, while still retaining his memories prior to the procedure (Corkin, 2002).

HM’s case offers rich evidence that memory is not a unitary construct but rather consists of different systems that serve distinct functions. Despite his inability to form new episodic and semantic memories, HM exhibited preserved procedural memory, which enabled him to learn new motor skills and perform previously learned tasks without conscious awareness (Corkin, 2002). One notable demonstration of this was HM’s ability to improve at a mirror-drawing task, indicating that procedural memory is separate from other forms of memory (Corkin, 2002).

Furthermore, HM’s case illuminated the critical role of the hippocampus in the formation of new memories. The hippocampus is a structure within the medial temporal lobes that is involved in the consolidation of information from short-term to long-term memory (Scoville & Milner, 1957). HM’s inability to create new memories strongly suggests that the hippocampus plays a crucial role in this process.

Cases like HM greatly contribute to our understanding of learning and cognition by delineating the specific functions and mechanisms underlying different aspects of memory. HM’s preserved procedural memory despite his severe anterograde amnesia highlights the distinction between explicit and implicit memory systems (Squire, 1992). Explicit memory, also known as declarative memory, refers to conscious, intentional remembering of facts and events, while implicit memory encompasses unconscious memories, such as skills and habits (Squire, 1992). HM’s case illustrates that these two memory systems operate independently, not solely relying on the hippocampus, but involving other brain regions as well.

Furthermore, HM’s case prompted researchers to explore alternative memory systems that function independently of the hippocampus. The case led to the discovery of a separate memory system known as the non-hippocampal declarative memory system, which can support the acquisition and use of new knowledge even in the absence of the hippocampus (Eichenbaum, 2001).

Additionally, HM’s case highlights the concept of memory consolidation, which refers to the process of transforming new memories into a stable, long-term form. The damage to HM’s hippocampus impaired his ability to consolidate new memories, demonstrating the crucial role of the hippocampus in this process (Scoville & Milner, 1957). This finding has stimulated research on the neural mechanisms of memory consolidation, leading to a better understanding of the molecular and cellular processes involved (Squire & Davis, 1981).

Overall, cases like HM provide valuable insights into the complexities of human memory and contribute to our understanding of learning and cognition. HM’s preserved procedural memory, despite his inability to form new memories, highlights the separate implicit memory system. Additionally, his case drives the exploration of non-hippocampal declarative memory systems and advances our understanding of memory consolidation processes. Through a multifaceted examination of HM’s amnesia, researchers have made significant strides in comprehending the various components and functions of human memory.