#36422 Topic: Discussion 8 Number of Pages: 1 (Double Spaced) Number of sources: 1 Writing Style: APA Type of document: Essay Academic Level:Master Category: Psychology Language Style: English (U.S.) Order Instructions: I will upload the instruction
The Relationship Between Attachment Styles and Marital Satisfaction: A Literature Review
Introduction
Attachment theory, initially proposed by John Bowlby, suggests that the way individuals form emotional bonds with others, particularly in early childhood, shapes their attachment styles and influences their interpersonal relationships throughout their lifespan (Bowlby, 1969). Research on attachment theory has primarily focused on the parent-child relationship and its impact on various aspects of child development. However, more recent studies have explored the role of attachment in romantic relationships, particularly in the context of marriage or long-term partnerships.
Marital satisfaction refers to the degree of satisfaction or happiness individuals experience in their marital relationships. It is an important indicator of relationship quality and can have significant implications for individuals’ overall well-being and mental health (Fincham & Beach, 2010). Attachment theory suggests that individuals’ attachment styles can significantly influence their level of marital satisfaction.
This literature review aims to examine the relationship between attachment styles and marital satisfaction. Specifically, it will explore the impact of secure, anxious, and avoidant attachment styles on marital satisfaction, as well as the potential mediators and moderators of this relationship.
Attachment Styles and Marital Satisfaction
Attachment styles can be classified into three main categories: secure, anxious, and avoidant. Individuals with a secure attachment style tend to have positive beliefs about themselves and others, feel comfortable with intimacy, and have high levels of trust and emotional support in their relationships (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007). Research consistently shows that individuals with a secure attachment style report higher levels of marital satisfaction compared to those with anxious or avoidant attachment styles (Collins & Feeney, 2004).
In contrast, individuals with an anxious attachment style have negative views about themselves and high levels of anxiety and fear of rejection in relationships (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007). They tend to be preoccupied with their partners and seek constant reassurance and validation. Several studies have found that individuals with an anxious attachment style report lower levels of marital satisfaction compared to those with a secure attachment style (e.g., Collins & Feeney, 2004; Simpson et al., 1996).
Similarly, individuals with an avoidant attachment style have negative views about others and tend to avoid intimacy and emotional closeness (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007). They often have difficulties trusting others and are uncomfortable with emotional dependency. Research has consistently shown that individuals with an avoidant attachment style report lower levels of marital satisfaction compared to those with a secure attachment style (e.g., Collins & Feeney, 2004; Simpson et al., 1996).
Mediators of the Attachment-Marital Satisfaction Relationship
Several factors have been proposed as mediators of the relationship between attachment styles and marital satisfaction. One potential mediator is communication style. Individuals with a secure attachment style tend to engage in effective and open communication, which promotes understanding, empathy, and emotional support in their relationships (Collins & Feeney, 2004). On the other hand, individuals with anxious or avoidant attachment styles may struggle with communication skills, leading to misunderstandings, conflicts, and lower marital satisfaction (Feeney et al., 1999).
Another potential mediator is relationship adjustment. Individuals with a secure attachment style are more likely to have positive relationship adjustment. They are better at adapting to changes, resolving conflicts, and maintaining relationship satisfaction (Collins & Feeney, 2004). In contrast, individuals with anxious or avoidant attachment styles may struggle with relationship adjustment, leading to lower levels of marital satisfaction (Feeney et al., 1999).
Furthermore, emotional intimacy has been proposed as a mediator of the attachment-marital satisfaction relationship. Individuals with a secure attachment style tend to experience higher levels of emotional intimacy in their relationships, characterized by trust, openness, and deep emotional connection (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007). Emotional intimacy acts as a protective factor against relationship dissatisfaction. In contrast, individuals with anxious or avoidant attachment styles may have difficulties forming and maintaining emotional intimacy, which can contribute to lower levels of marital satisfaction (Collins & Feeney, 2004).
Moderators of the Attachment-Marital Satisfaction Relationship
Several factors have been suggested as moderators of the relationship between attachment styles and marital satisfaction. One potential moderator is relationship length. Research indicates that the impact of attachment styles on marital satisfaction may vary depending on the duration of the relationship. For example, individuals with an anxious attachment style may experience higher levels of marital satisfaction in the early stages of a relationship, characterized by excitement and novelty, but may struggle with long-term marital satisfaction as the relationship progresses (Collins & Feeney, 2004).
Another potential moderator is relationship conflict. The impact of attachment styles on marital satisfaction may be influenced by the presence of relationship conflict. Research suggests that individuals with an anxious attachment style may be particularly sensitive to relationship conflict, experiencing higher levels of distress and lower levels of satisfaction compared to those with a secure attachment style (Cowan et al., 2006). However, the impact of relationship conflict on marital satisfaction may depend on individuals’ ability to effectively resolve conflicts and maintain relationship harmony (Feeney et al., 1999).
Conclusion
In conclusion, numerous studies have demonstrated a consistent relationship between attachment styles and marital satisfaction. Individuals with a secure attachment style tend to report higher levels of marital satisfaction, while those with anxious or avoidant attachment styles often report lower levels. Communication style, relationship adjustment, and emotional intimacy have been proposed as mediators of this relationship, while relationship length and conflict have been suggested as moderators. Understanding the role of attachment styles in marital satisfaction can have important implications for couples therapy and interventions aimed at improving relationship quality. Further research is needed to explore the complex mechanisms underlying this relationship and identify effective strategies for promoting marital satisfaction among individuals with insecure attachment styles.