Find a test to assess, intelligence or education, find a s…

Find a test to assess, intelligence or education, find a similar alternative test for administration with an individual who may be blind, deaf, or nonverbal. How are they similar? How are they different?


Assessing intelligence or education is crucial for understanding an individual’s cognitive abilities and educational attainment. Standardized tests have traditionally been used for this purpose, but they may pose challenges for individuals who are blind, deaf, or nonverbal. To ensure fair and accurate assessments for these individuals, alternative tests with similar objectives and methodologies are needed. This paper aims to identify a test commonly used to assess intelligence or education and propose a corresponding alternative test for individuals who are blind, deaf, or nonverbal. The similarities and differences between the two tests will be analyzed.

Assessment of Intelligence or Education:

One common test used to assess intelligence is the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC), which is widely recognized and utilized. The WISC measures cognitive abilities in children and adolescents aged 6 to 16 years. It consists of several subtests, including verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, working memory, and processing speed. The results of these subtests are combined to generate an overall IQ score, which provides an estimate of an individual’s cognitive abilities compared to their same-age peers.

For assessments of education, one widely used measure is the Stanford Achievement Test (SAT), which assesses students’ knowledge in various academic subjects such as reading, mathematics, and science. The SAT is commonly used for college admissions and measures an individual’s academic achievement and readiness for higher education.

Alternative Tests for Individuals who are Blind:

There are specific challenges faced by individuals who are blind in traditional assessment methods that rely heavily on visual stimuli. To address this, alternatives such as the Tactile Performance Test (TPT) have been developed. The TPT engages the sense of touch and measures an individual’s ability to identify and discriminate different tactile stimuli. It assesses perceptual abilities, manual dexterity, and tactile discrimination skills.

Similarly, for individuals who are blind, an alternative test for assessing education could be the Braille Achievement Tests. These tests assess the student’s proficiency in reading Braille, spelling, and comprehension. They are designed to evaluate the levels of academic achievement and provide insights into an individual’s educational progress.

Alternative Tests for Individuals who are Deaf:

Assessing individuals who are deaf presents another set of challenges, particularly when it comes to traditional verbal-based tests. One alternative test that addresses this issue is the American Sign Language Proficiency Interview (ASLPI). ASLPI evaluates an individual’s ability to understand and use American Sign Language (ASL), which is the primary language used by the deaf community. This assessment focuses on the linguistic and communicative proficiency of individuals who rely on ASL as their primary mode of communication.

Going beyond assessing education, another alternative test for individuals who are deaf could be the Gallaudet University Academic Bowl. This competition-style event evaluates students’ knowledge in various academic subjects through a combination of written and signed questions. It highlights the academic achievements of individuals who are deaf and promotes their engagement in a competitive academic environment.

Alternative Tests for Individuals who are Nonverbal:

Assessing individuals who are nonverbal presents unique challenges due to their limited or absent speech capabilities. One alternative test that addresses this issue is the Raven’s Progressive Matrices (RPM). RPM is a nonverbal test that assesses individuals’ abstract and logical reasoning abilities. It involves solving visual puzzles and identifying patterns to measure cognitive skills independent of language and verbal communication.

In addition to intelligence assessment, an alternative test for individuals who are nonverbal and want to assess their educational progress could be the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. This test evaluates an individual’s adaptive functioning in various domains such as communication, daily living skills, socialization, and motor skills. It provides insights into an individual’s abilities to cope with daily life and adapt to different environments.

Similarities and Differences:

Despite the unique challenges posed by blindness, deafness, or nonverbalism, alternative tests aim to provide similar objectives as their traditional counterparts. Both traditional and alternative tests assess cognitive abilities or educational achievements, albeit through different modalities. The alternative tests mentioned above utilize tactile, visual, or signed stimuli as substitutes for traditional visual or verbal stimuli.

In terms of differences, alternative tests require adaptations to accommodate the specific needs of individuals who are blind, deaf, or nonverbal. These adaptations may require modifications to test formats, stimuli, administration instructions, and scoring procedures. Additionally, the alternative tests may focus on different aspects such as tactile discrimination, sign language proficiency, or nonverbal cognitive skills specific to each sensory or communication challenge.