I NEED TO DISCRIBE THE BEST CONDUCT THAT I WILL USE AS A PTA IN SCENARIO NUMBER 7 USING THE MORAL ETHICS PLAN IN APTA WEBSITE PLEASE FOLLOW INTRSUCTION IN THE DOCUMENT ATTACHED THANK YOU
Title: Ethical Conduct as a Physical Therapist Assistant: Scenario Analysis
In the field of healthcare, ethical conduct forms the cornerstone of professional practice. Physical Therapist Assistants (PTAs) play a critical role in promoting patient well-being and must adhere to a strong moral and ethical code. This paper analyzes Scenario Number 7, incorporating the Moral Ethics Plan provided by the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA). By applying the principles and guidelines outlined in the APTA’s plan, the best course of action will be determined to ensure ethical conduct as a PTA in this particular scenario.
Summary of Scenario Number 7:
Scenario Number 7 involves a PTA who has been assigned to a patient diagnosed with a musculoskeletal condition. During the initial evaluation, the PTA identifies an opportunity to recommend additional treatment sessions to extend the patient’s therapy. The referring physical therapist, however, advises against offering additional treatment due to potential financial strain on the patient. The PTA is faced with the dilemma of following the therapist’s instructions or advocating for what they believe is the best course of action for the patient.
To navigate this ethical dilemma effectively, it is crucial to refer to the APTA Moral Ethics Plan. This plan outlines various principles and guidelines that assist physical therapy professionals in making informed ethical decisions.
1. Principle 1: Beneficence:
The principle of beneficence obliges PTAs to act in the best interest of their patients, promoting their welfare and striving to optimize outcomes. In Scenario Number 7, the PTA’s inclination to recommend additional treatment sessions can be justified by the intention to improve the patient’s well-being. However, considering the referral therapist’s concern about the patient’s financial situation, the PTA must carefully weigh the potential benefits against the financial burden.
2. Principle 2: Non-maleficence:
Non-maleficence requires PTAs to avoid harm and minimize risks to patients. By recommending additional treatment, the PTA may be exposing the patient to a potential financial burden. Ethical decision-making in this scenario involves considering whether the potential benefits of extended therapy outweigh the potential harm of financial strain.
3. Principle 3: Autonomy:
Patient autonomy emphasizes the importance of respecting patients’ rights to make informed decisions about their healthcare. In Scenario Number 7, the PTA must assess whether the patient possesses the necessary information and capacity to decide on additional treatment sessions autonomously. The PTA should engage in open and honest communication with the patient, explaining the potential benefits and financial implications, allowing the patient to make an informed decision.
4. Principle 4: Justice:
Justice involves ensuring fairness in the distribution of healthcare resources and avoiding discrimination. In this scenario, the PTA should consider the financial constraints of the patient before making recommendations. By taking into account the patient’s ability to afford additional sessions, the PTA would uphold the principle of justice.
5. Principle 5: Veracity:
Veracity necessitates honesty and truth-telling in patient-provider relationships. In Scenario Number 7, the PTA should be transparent with the patient about the financial implications of extended therapy sessions. The PTA should provide a balanced view, outlining the potential benefits as well as the potential financial strain, ensuring the patient makes an informed decision.
Based on the analysis of these ethical principles, the best course of action for the PTA in Scenario Number 7 would involve:
1. Engaging in open and empathetic communication with the patient to understand their goals, concerns, and financial situation.
2. Discussing the potential benefits and financial implications of additional treatment sessions, providing accurate and objective information.
3. Encouraging the patient to discuss their concerns with the referring physical therapist and involve them in the decision-making process.
4. Respecting the patient’s autonomy by allowing them to make an informed decision about continuing therapy, with a clear understanding of the potential financial strain.
5. Advocating for the patient’s well-being by suggesting alternative resources, such as financial assistance programs or resources that may help alleviate the financial burden while still accessing necessary care.
Adhering to a strong moral and ethical code is imperative for PTAs in promoting patient care and well-being. By employing the ethical principles outlined in the APTA’s Moral Ethics Plan, PTAs can navigate complex scenarios such as Scenario Number 7 and make informed decisions that prioritize patient welfare while considering potential financial constraints.